The effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on the competitiveness of firms in the Mobile Telecommunication industry in Ghana
Emmanuel Selase Asamoah
The study examined the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices in achieving competitive advantage in the Mobile Telecommunication Industry in Ghana. Specifically, the study determined the extent of implementation of CSR policies by the Mobile Telecommunication companies, ascertained the factors influencing the companies to engage in CSR, examined the perceived influence of the practice of CSR in achieving competitive advantage among the companies, and identified the main challenges facing the Telecom companies in the implementation of CSR. The study used quantitative methodology to achieve its purpose. A survey questionnaire was used to gather data for the study. Overall 360 employees were selected from all the 6 Mobile Telecommunication companies operating in Ghana. The companies selected included GLO, AIRTEL, VODAFONE, MTN, EXPRESO and TIGO. Only senior managers of the various firms were sampled for the study. Both descriptive and inferential statistical tools were used in the data analysis. The study found that the performance of the companies CSR practices was high in the areas of community support, environmental issues, and ethics. The companies engaged in CSR for various reason including enhancing the reputation of the company’s, for positive image and branding of the company, to gain some competitive advantages, to improve business performance etc. The companies gained to moderated extent competitive advantage by engaging in CSR, VODAFONE gained higher competitive advantage than all the mobile telecommunication companies. A positive feeling complacency was the main challenge of the companies in undertaking their CSR initiatives and practices. The study recommends that shareholders should increase their commitment level to the practice of CSR as such practice was found to have effect in achieving competitive advantage.
Reference:
Alexander. G., & Buchholz. R. A., (1978). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 21, 479-86.
Amposah-Tawiah, K & Dartey-Baah, K (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2 (17)
Ashley, P. A. (2002). Ethics and Social Responsibility us business, Sao Paulo: Saraiva.
Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business & Society, 41, 292 – 318.
Beckmann , S. C. (2006). Consumers Perceptions of and Responses to CSR: So Little Is Known so far ... In: M. Morsing & S.C. Beckmann (eds.). Strategic CSR Communication. Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing, 163–184.
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L .L. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives, Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111-132.
Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance’. Financial Management, 16, 5-14.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16,(3),297-334.
Dolničar, S. and Grün, B. (2007). Cross‐cultural differences in survey response patterns, International Marketing Review, 24 (2), pp. 127‐43.
Donaldson, T. & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications", Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a Name? Reputation building and Corporate Strategy’. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233 – 58.
Galbreath, J. (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy: Strategic Options, Global Considerations. Corporate Governance. 175-187.
Garriga, E. & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory, Journal of Business Ethics 53, pp. 51-71
Guerra, M.C.G. (2002). Community relations in mineral development projects. The CEPMLP Internet Journal, 11,1-31.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Hillman, A. and Keim, G. (2001).Shareholder value,stakeholder management,and social issues:What’s the bottomline? Strategic Management Journal, 22:125-139
Jones, T. (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20:404-437
Jonker, J. & Roome, N. (2005). Mvo integreren in de bedrijfsvoering. Management Executive, 3, 4-11.
Lankoski, L. (2008) Corporate responsibility activities and economic performance: a theory of why and how they are connected. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 17, pp. 536-547
Lunheim, R., (2003). Operationalizing Corporate Social Responsibility. Visions of Ethical Business. Financial Times -Prentice Hall.
Marcus A., (1993). Business and Society; Ethics, Government, and the World Economy. Boston: Irwin
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305. Retrieved March 20, 2007 from EBSCOHost Business Source Complete Database.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-227.
Miller, C. (1997). Marketers Weigh the Effects of Sweatshop Crackdown’. Marketing News, 31(10), 1,19.
Orlitzky, M. (2008). Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Research Synthesis. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Oxford.
Pava, M., & Krausz, J. (1996). The Association between corporate social- responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321-327.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review,
Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006). A Corporate Social Performance-Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540 – 58.
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research. 38: 225-243.
Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52-76.
Smith, A. D. (2007). Making the case for the competitive advantage of corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy Series, 8(3), pp. 186-195
Ullmann, A.A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A Critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10 (3).
Waddock, S., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S.B. (2002). Responsibility: The new business imperative. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132-148.
Walton, S. B. (2010). Do the right thing: Measuring the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Tactics, 17(7), 10-11.
Wheeler, D., Colbert, B., & Freeman, R. E. (2003). Focusing on Value: Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and a Stakeholder Approach in a Network World’, Journal of General Management, 28(3), 1–29.
Wright, P., & Ferris, S. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (No.1), 77-83.